Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stephen Akers

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 21:12, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Stephen Akers

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Akers has not played on a team in a fully professional league. John Pack Lambert (talk) 04:31, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Nfitz (talk) 17:50, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - I don't know what has changed since the last AFD. The article notes that he made his professional debut for County on 17 October 2006 in a Football League Trophy game against Barnet with references. As noted in the last AFD the 2006–07 Football League Trophy was a fully professional competition and he played in it. Passes WP:NFOOTBALL. Can User:Johnpacklambert explain the logic here, and why he didn't include the previous AFD despite it being shown clearly on the Talk page. Nfitz (talk) 17:50, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Johnpacklambert: Nfitz (talk) 13:40, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Withdrawal I see my logic is flawed. I had focused too much on that Akers is currently in a league that is no where near fully prifessional. I should have better taken into account the fact that football play progession is non linear. I did not link to the orevious discussion because it was under a different spelling. I should have checked the talk page but I figured any previous AfD would be under the same name. This is an overlook of a step I should have done. I could point out that most talk pages do not say anything substantive burlt I still shoyld have checked it and hope people will forgive me for this ovwrsight.John Pack Lambert (talk) 14:24, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.