Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Steller Secondary School (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was SNOW keep. Nomination of high school article by newly-registered SPA. This discussion should have been closed as Speedy keep a long time ago. (non-admin closure) Optakeover^(U)(T)(C) 16:53, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Steller Secondary School

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There are no indepent sources, this school has no evidence of being notable, and it also reads like an advertisement for the school Alright, so in response to the below commecnts: The fact that it is a highschool does not actually protect it from deletion if it does not meet notability standards, as per Wikipedia:Notability (high schools) which also states that if information cannot be verified, then it may be challenged and removed from the article. As laid out is Wikipedia:Notability (organizations and companies), to be notable the school's article must have depth of coverage, using reliable sources. These sources may not be self published. It also needs to have attention from media to a certain extent, but coverage should be from something more read than local media. This article does not have any international coverage, it does not cite any independent sources, and if I was to remove all uncited material this article would be a candidate for speedy deletion. I do know that lack of sources does not indicate that the subject is not notable, but I also cannot find any sources from my research. (Which I think answers the other objection, because I have looked and I cannot find any sources for this information other that the school's own website.) And as for my being a new user, that's why I keep messing up and making work more difficult for the bots, and I'm really sorry about that) FluffyKitty999 (talk) 01:59, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2017 September 14. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 02:22, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Lepricavark (talk) 02:35, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Alaska-related deletion discussions. Lepricavark (talk) 02:35, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy keep and close High schools are generally held to be notable in and of themselves following a long standing consensus. Please direct any concerns about promotional tone to the talk page on the article. Has the article nominator made an attempt to improve the article before nominating it for deletion?Egaoblai (talk) 07:49, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy keep and close - there's nothing wrong with this article. Note that the nominator is a new user with only 6 edits, 5 of which involved the attempts to start this AfD. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 12:24, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
SNOW Keep - Per others. 47.208.20.130 (talk) 22:46, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep probably meets the speedy keep criteria as a POINTy nomination by a new account (likely an old user who just got so used to Twinkle they don't know how to transclude). That being said, it pretty easily meets the GNG. It receives coverage in To Russia with Love (one paragraph viewable via Google Books, the description of the event seems to continue into the next page. Google News also brings up a few mediocre hits, but I'm also assuming we don't have the entirety of the Anchorage Paper's archives (probably one of the regions of the US that it is hardest to find sourcing on). There are a few other mentions in Google Books as well. This is enough to get it to GNG for me at least in how we typically apply it to other secondary schools (even post-RfC, we tend to be more flexible here). TonyBallioni (talk) 14:35, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.