Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Starnotti Ilio
Appearance
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 08:42, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Starnotti Ilio (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Does not meet WP:Creative. The only google results are this page and wikipedia mirrors. This was already deleted on the Italian wiki [1], and if he isn't considered notable by Italian speakers, how can we consider him notable in this language? Petropoxy (Lithoderm Proxy) (talk) 03:31, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. —Petropoxy (Lithoderm Proxy) (talk) 03:34, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom...Modernist (talk) 00:12, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom.--Ethicoaestheticist (talk) 23:09, 3 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz talk 00:58, 4 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, does not appear to meet WP:CREATIVE - the only coverage I can find for this person is directory entries and Wikipedia mirrors. Lankiveil (speak to me) 04:41, 4 April 2009 (UTC).[reply]
- Delete per nom.Artblogs (talk) 18:34, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Johnbod (talk) 03:14, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.