Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stanley Sambey

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Rjd0060 (talk) 14:42, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Stanley Sambey

Speedied once under A7, and nominated for PROD a second time. Speedy challenged at User talk:SchuminWeb#why delete my page?, where author admitted their conflict of interest in creating the article about themselves. Article was recreated by the original author, and nominated for PROD by another editor who was unaware of the earlier speedy. The PROD text was, "Subject of article does not appear to be notable per WP:PEOPLE". I have challenged the PROD per the earlier fuss being made, and therefore take it to AFD. SchuminWeb (Talk) 20:03, 28 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete- The article fails to explain the notability of the subject. The main claim to notability appears to be that Stanley Sambey was a founding member of the Federal Marijuana Party however I can't find anything regarding this on their website. I can't locate any reliable sources which verify the content of the article. Nk.sheridan Talk 20:21, 28 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - yup, I forgot the WP:COI issue! btw, I'm the editor mentioned as nominating for PROD. Nk.sheridan Talk 20:27, 28 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete non-notable article, conflict of interest. Chimeric Glider (talk) 20:23, 28 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Not a notable subject. The main writer is the subject himself, which likely results in a conflict of interest. Additionally, the article would need significant rewriting to meet Wikipedia standards. And since the person is non-notable, it'll be next to impossible for anyone but him to do so. Nwwaew (Talk Page) (Contribs) (E-mail me) 20:38, 28 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete non-notable, appears to be a self-promotion article, little verifiable info. -Toon⁰⁵ 21:30, 28 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete according to nominator, per WP:PEOPLE and WP:COI, Postoak (talk) 21:44, 28 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nomination and WP:SALT possibly if things become problematic. JBsupreme (talk) 02:33, 29 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The person hasn't been elected to any public office. Article has no reliable sources. Artene50 (talk) 10:22, 29 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 19:58, 29 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - Creating editor (User:Stambo2001) has challenged deletion at my talkpage. I've directed him here per this Nk.sheridan Talk 21:13, 29 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.