Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Standardcotton

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Secret ^account 23:41, 4 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Standardcotton

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable company. A run-of-the-mill company with run-of-the-mill local coverage. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 12:51, 20 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Placing among the finalists of a non-notable local award or being suggested as "perhaps the world's smallest online clothing store" (when there must be many one-person operations) is not evidence of attained notability. AllyD (talk) 18:29, 20 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Austria-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:25, 21 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:25, 21 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:26, 21 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 21:56, 27 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - I disagree with the nominator's statement that we have " run-of-the-mill local coverage". I'd characterize the coverage as worse than run-of-the mill. Also, the attribution of "smallest online clothing store" to the newspaper is misleading. It'a actually a quote from a jury member of the local contest. The sources that are provided fall well short of establishing notability, and I can find nothing myself that would indicate notability. -- Whpq (talk) 14:07, 3 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.