Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stacy Offenberger

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC(talk) 21:54, 6 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Stacy Offenberger

Stacy Offenberger (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A competitor in beauty pageants who placed third on one of only two national competitions she competed in, and did not place in the other. No sources other than in the context of the pageants. Aside from the usual issues of objectifying women, this article has nothing to show notability of the subject. Guy (help!) 19:15, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Beauty pageants-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 19:26, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ohio-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 19:26, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 20:40, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 20:40, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 20:41, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete state titles are not enough on their own to confer notability, and the sourcing is not enough to show notability either.John Pack Lambert (talk) 16:43, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Missvain (talk) 18:58, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - model with no notable wins. If she had, on the other hand, came in third in Miss America, then she might be notable. Bearian (talk) 18:56, 3 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete with respect to Bearian, I don't think we need to worry about wins or not. This is a complete WP:GNG fail. There's literally no reliable, independent source coverage about this beauty pageant contest that is both in-depth and at-length. So, per that and per nom, it's a delete. Doug Mehus T·C 02:21, 6 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. No coverage whatsoever. As for being a contestant, I couldn't find any specific notability guidelines referring to beauty contestants. Even the relevant WikiProject isn't sure. Therefore I think there are no grounds for deeming her notable. PK650 (talk) 04:19, 6 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.