Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stacy Kimball

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 06:03, 20 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The only thing she has done of note is appear in a single season of Survivor, where she was not an overly notable person. Precedent has already been established that merely appearing on Survivor is not enough for a page. Also, the page has no sources. -- Scorpion⁰⁴²² 00:06, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom, unless we want to open the door to biographies of every game show contestant that ever was. TCC (talk) (contribs) 00:18, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. RFerreira 05:53, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. The link fails WP:RS as it is marketing for the show. Stripped of the Survivor content, the dearth of biographical material screams "destined to remain a stub forever". Ohconfucius 09:37, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom Phantom784 05:41, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom, though I don't think keeping this would open the door to as wide as TCC fears. Maxamegalon2000 19:46, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom, 6th place is certainly not notable enough for an article. Survivorfan101 07:46, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - no other notability outside her appearance on survivor. -- Whpq 17:42, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Do not delete Take away Donald Trump's money and he's not notable, either. But he is rich, and Stacy was on Survivor. They are both notable. Recommend do not delete.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.