Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stacey Glick

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. It looks like the article has been improved over the course of this discusion Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:22, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Stacey Glick

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NACTOR. Only had three small film roles and two small TV roles. EnPassant♟♙ (talk) 04:12, 30 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers and New York. Shellwood (talk) 05:44, 30 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:58, 30 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails WP:NACTOR, current article is completely devoid of reliable sources and I was unable to find any in searches. Keeping this article on Wikipedia would quickly run into WP:BLP issues. W 42 13:40, 30 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: Will this article see the 17th anniversary of its creation (created 20 Nov 2005 by Stephen Day)? I hope so, I've tried to do a bit of improvement based on some quick research which I think shows she meets GNG. Fun fact, Glick was in the 1981 ABC TV movie The Day the Loving Stopped where she played a younger version of the role played by Ally Sheedy--one of Sheedy's earliest film roles.--Milowent • ^hasspoken 14:18, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Numbers 5 and 6 of the new sources are primary and don't count towards notability. EnPassant♟♙ (talk) 22:04, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:13, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: Aside from the newly-added sources, there are plenty of hits at newspapers.com, with more than just passing mentions. The subject passes WP:GNG and she appeared in notable productions. Dflaw4 (talk) 17:19, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:46, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per WP:HEY. Passes WP:SIGCOV and WP:NACTOR per the sources added to the article.4meter4 (talk) 06:09, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.