Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sruthi Singh

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 08:03, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sruthi Singh (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not appear to be notable as per Wikipedia's criteria. The references given are an interview with a blog (unnamed author), and being mentioned in listicles. Google search does not unearth significant coverage in multiple reliable sources. ... discospinster _talk 04:14, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. ... discospinster _talk 04:14, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. ... discospinster _talk 04:14, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. ... discospinster _talk 04:14, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: No evidence of notability. Websearch doesn't show anything to support notability. - hako9 (talk) 08:07, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: Not notable according to all criteria. The article is written in promotional style. The premise of the article reinforces that if she has 41k+ followers on Instragram, she must be notable. Roller26 (talk) 10:22, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Notability is not established. --Ab207 (talk) 14:08, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. TJMSmith (talk) 14:19, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Virginia-related deletion discussions. TJMSmith (talk) 14:19, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Not notable. –Roscelese (talk ⋅ contribs) 00:21, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: No coverage found in secondary, reliable sources.Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 10:28, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.