Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sri Siddhartha University

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was KEEP. Sue Rangell ✍ ✉ 20:21, 8 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sri Siddhartha University

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Almost empty article. No attempt made to demonstrate the notability of the university. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 11:35, 6 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, sorry but a deemed university is per se notable. --Soman (talk) 07:59, 7 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: Confirmed university.--Milowent • ^hasspoken 14:27, 7 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Appears to be a legitimate University, in fact they teach Medicine there. Deathlibrarian (talk) 14:26, 7 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep A legitimate tertiary center of education, with several departments. Notable.--Dwaipayan (talk) 15:37, 7 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep 'Almost Empty Article' is not a valid reason for deletion. Roodog2k (talk) 20:19, 7 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Obvious Keep - A deemed university whose legal and physical existence can be verified should be an obvious keep. Amartyabag ^TALK2ME 15:02, 8 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
What were you thinking? Its Keep. Notable per topic itself. I wanted to close this AfD under Appropriate closures as AfDs are not for filling up the "almost empty" articles. (I would have thought the nominating Admin would know that.) But am still keeping it open so they don't have any doubts about a University's notability. And in meanwhile someone would probably clean it also. And what happened with Wikipedia-is-a-collaborative-project thing? Please notify WT:IN or concerned WikiProject by leaving a note and not raising AfD in case you come across any such "almost empty" articles. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 17:44, 8 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.