Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Springer Series in Surface Sciences

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Ed (Edgar181) 20:52, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Springer Series in Surface Sciences

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NBOOK and WP:TEXTBOOKS. No references and no results in a Google search other than database listings. –eggofreason^talk 19:44, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bibliographies-related deletion discussions. ~Ruyaba~ {talk} 20:38, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 01:40, 17 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academic journals-related deletion discussions. Randykitty (talk) 09:38, 17 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I think it possible for book series like this to notable, e.g., the Lecture Notes book series is likely notable. But for this smaller, more specialized series, I was unable to find any secondary sources reviewing the series, or discussing its impact, etc. Springer has many specialized book series and merging this one into the main Springer article would lend undue weight to the series. Hence, delete. --{{u|Mark viking}} {Talk} 16:15, 17 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mhhossein ^talk 05:20, 20 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Not every book series is notable and this one diesn't appear to have the necessary coverage. --Randykitty (talk) 06:58, 20 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete not notable. --MaoGo (talk) 11:47, 20 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.