Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Spirgai

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The one "keep" makes no sense. Sandstein 19:41, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Spirgai

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. The 2 references added do not prove notability. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 22:56, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. clpo13_(talk) 23:49, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lithuania-related deletion discussions. clpo13_(talk) 23:49, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 17:08, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:26, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: final relist — Music1201 ^talk 17:59, 26 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Music1201 ^talk 17:59, 26 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - An element of a cuisine is an element of cuisine improve but certainly don"t take it off the menuMasterknighted (talk) 00:12, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The problem with establishing notability for this dish is that there is a paucity of English sources. The one book cited, by Martin Scheffer, has just a passing mention. Searches just don't turn up reliable sources in English. Geoff | ^{Who, me?} 19:47, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment, don't need to be English sources ie. WP:NONENG - "Citations to non-English sources are allowed on English Wikipedia. However, because this is the English-language Wikipedia, English-language sources are preferred over non-English ones whenever English sources of equal quality and relevance are available". Coolabahapple (talk) 09:53, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Thanks, Coolabahapple, I did not know that one. Perhaps a Lithuanian speaker can evaluate the mentioned that turn up in a gNews search. They look to me like non-reliable sources, but I can't be sure, as I am not conversant in Lithuanian. Geoff | ^{Who, me?} 15:54, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.