Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Speechless EP

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Also the article about the band BUCK Enterprises has been deleted so this qualifies for deletion under CSD A9, as a music recording by redlinked artist and no indication of importance or significance, as well. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 18:58, 27 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speechless EP

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable album. Walter Görlitz (talk) 02:23, 12 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:13, 12 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Please note that the nominator has also listed BUCK Live for deletion as well. A detailed search at Google News archives provided nothing relevant nor did a Google Books search. I would suggest redirecting to the band but it seems the band themselves aren't notable and this is probably due to the Christian music ties. A Google News search for the band only provided one result here and Google Books one result as well here (third result from the top, Encyclopedia of contemporary Christian music). I am very concerned that articles were created for all of the albums with no references and no references for the band's article itself either. I plan to nominate the band's article very soon after some more searches (to be absolutely sure) and will mention both of these nominations. From there, we could simply A9 the other albums rather than wasting time with individual nominations. SwisterTwister talk 05:57, 12 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Would your purge perhaps be appeased if someone uploaded physical evidence the albums existed? Why are you going on the war path against a particular band, especially when some of the information here is unique to Wikipedia, especially the chronology of the albums (versus rooting through several websites in order to come to the same conclusion about the band's name)? The band does not have their own website but neither does Beethoven. Amazon sells their music. It's recognized on last.fm, MySpace, and Yahoo Music.

Further, Buck was signed to several smaller labels. You appear to connote being a Christian band implicitly means they are not important. Perhaps I am misreading that but it sounds a bit biased.. --Primetech 19:11, 22 January 2013 (UTC)

Keep-- see reasoning above. But if obliterating the content is deemed worthwhile then please do not allow the removal of the band's information at the very least. --Primetech 19:11, 22 January 2013 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles 01:48, 19 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Cheers, Riley 00:10, 26 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - I concur with SisterTwister. Primetech, this is not a purge, and having things sold on Amazon does in no way make you notable. last.fm, Myspace and Yahoo Music are also not a method of determining notability - anyone can appear on those. Being signed to a number of small band labels isn't a grounds for notability either. I also don't see any criticism of the Christian genre of music... Lukeno94 (talk) 10:57, 26 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.