Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Space 220 Restaurant

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. RL0919 (talk) 23:17, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Space 220 Restaurant

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Right now, there is only a single in-depth piece on this restaurant from an independent, reliable source. All the rest are either non-reliable (blogs, allears.nets) or from non-independent sources. Searches did not turn up enough other independent in-depth sourcing to meet WP:GNG. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:58, 7 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:58, 7 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:58, 7 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete or redirect to Epcot since as Onel5969 says there is not enough independent, in-depth coverage of this to meet the notability guidelines. Nor is there anything particularly notable sounding about it in general either. That said, it would make sense to do a redirect and mention it in the article about the Epcot Center. I'm actually kind of surprised it isn't mentioned there already. --Adamant1 (talk) 16:26, 7 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep There are reliable sources. There are three from insider but here is one, Mynews13, Orlando Sentinel, Fox35Orlando, and Orlando Weekly ― Kaleeb18^Talk_Caleb 16:44, 7 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Here are some others that I am unsure about. Cleveland.com, Orlando Informer, Space.com, The Science Times, and Attractions Magazine. I was planning to work on this article, but got caught up in the woody (Toy Story) GA review. ― Kaleeb18^Talk_Caleb 16:55, 7 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  Attractions Magazine (WP:RSN), Space.com, Cleveland.com are all reliable. This easily passes WP:GNG. ― Kaleeb18^Talk_Caleb 21:46, 8 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Normally I would agree about the Space.com article. Except in this case it's talking about the restaurant building a space elevator that is still in the planning phase. So it's a 100% PRish hype article about something that has very little chance of actually occurring, at least any time soon. Which I don't think is helpful for notability since any half reputable company would get the same kind of coverage from Space.com and similar space themed news outlets if they claimed they were building a space elevator/outer space restaurant. --Adamant1 (talk) 17:09, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Adamant1: yeah, but there are still like 10ish sources and others that can be used. ― Kaleeb18^Talk_Caleb 22:09, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Kaleeb18: True. It looks like they are either local or more of the same though. For instance the Attractions Magazine article is almost an exact copy of the Space.com one. Same goes for the orlandoinformer.com article. All the Cleveland.com article says is that you can get reservations. Which is pretty run of the mill. So I'm not really sure what good those 10ish or so other references are when they are exactly the same or just saying extremely trivial nonsense, like that someone can reserve a seat at the restaurant. --Adamant1 (talk) 12:58, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Bear with me I can give you more but it is super hard on this IPad so it might take awhile or I can do it on my chrome book later. ― Kaleeb18^Talk_Caleb 14:10, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No worries. I'm sure there's more references out there. Anything even semi-related to Disney usually gets a lot of press because of the association alone if nothing else. --Adamant1 (talk) 23:07, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Adamant1: Here is more proof that is passes WP:GNG and there is still some more Attractions Magazine 1, Attractions Magazine 2, Attractions Magazine 3, Collider, some more Orlando Weekly 1, Orlando Weekly 2, Orlando Weekly 3, Orlando Weekly 4, People, Narcity, unsure about Snopes, WFTV, Times Now News, don’t know if Daily Mail can be used for something like this, more Orlando Sentinel 1, Orlando Sentinel 2, Orlando Sentinel 3, Click Orlando, Fox35Orlando 1, Fox35Orlando 2, Insider, and I am unsure about Travel and Leisure ― Kaleeb18^Talk_Caleb 18:50, 12 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I changed my vote to keep. Since I think the references you found are more then enough. --Adamant1 (talk) 18:59, 12 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I do think we need to delete or redirect Pecos Bill Tall Tale Inn and Cafe it has no reliable sources. (Maybe redirect it into Pecos Bill the fictional character). ― Kaleeb18^Talk_Caleb 17:02, 7 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep In light of the references found by Kaleeb18. Which I think are enough at this point to justify the article being kept. --Adamant1 (talk) 18:59, 12 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, as there are clearly enough reliable sources for notability.Jackattack1597 (talk) 20:08, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.