Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sozo Water Park (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:43, 4 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sozo Water Park

AfDs for this article:

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Refs provide no evidence of notability. Searches reveal a whole raft of mentions but all seem to be either advertisements from the travel industry (expedia, Booking.com) etc or personal reviews and social media including Pinterest, Facebook etc.. Fails WP:GNG Velella ^{Velella Talk} 14:24, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Amusement parks and Pakistan. Velella ^{Velella Talk} 14:24, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep- There is some independent coverage:

Insight 3 (talk) 04:41, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Commment - as noted in the nomination, there are many "review" sites out there re-posting press releases or advertorials. Of these only the last one seems independent, and advertising that the site lost its captive Dolphins due to negligence is probably not the greatest selling point for a water park. Velella ^{Velella Talk} 09:55, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Well, the first two sources are reliable mainstream news sites in Pakistan and can't be promotional about any non-notable park. The rest also don't appear to have any connection with the park admins.

There is some coverage in Urdu news media as well:

Urdu Point

City42 tv

Also, "independent coverage" doesn't necessarily mean "negative coverage". Insight 3 (talk) 10:22, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, RL0919 (talk) 16:01, 24 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - 3 children and 2 adults were killed at the park in December 2004 when a merry-go-round collapsed. This became the subject of a scholarly paper looking into the cause. Rupples (talk) 00:18, 26 November 2022 (UTC) These sources are known to the nominator of this AfD as they were pointed out as reasons to keep the article when the same nominator initially proposed deletion in 2020, yet have not been added to the article. Not sure where this leaves us. Rupples (talk) 01:01, 26 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:25, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the Article Rescue Squadron's list of content for rescue consideration. Lightburst (talk) 16:47, 3 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I am working on the article - but it is clear that it is a notable water park. It is the largest water park in Pakistan. Lightburst (talk) 16:47, 3 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep The park is notable, and proper sourcing is beind added by other users. TH1980 (talk) 18:32, 4 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Sources support that WP:GNG is met. MrsSnoozyTurtle 21:09, 4 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.