Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sophophobia

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Dennis - 22:15, 26 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sophophobia (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The topic of the article is a neologism, based solely on non-reliable websites. As noted at List of phobias, there are many unreliable lists of phobias that can be found online. Wikipedia's policies require that there be reliable sources that discuss a named phobia, before we create an article on it. Srleffler (talk) 21:30, 18 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as lacking in depth coverage in reliable sources. Stuartyeates (talk) 22:13, 18 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as non-notable per the same arguments I gave at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chionophobia.Sjö (talk) 22:40, 18 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:35, 19 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Behavioural science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:35, 19 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica1000 05:43, 19 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete for the same reasons mentioned at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chionophobia. A Google Scholar search for sophophobia gives some clues as to where such terms come from: books for weird words and low quality self-help books. NikosGouliaros (talk) 21:29, 19 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.