Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sonic recolor
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was DELETE. postdlf (talk) 23:04, 2 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Sonic recolor
- Sonic recolor (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable picture recolor of sonic characters. Possibly neologism, no indication of independent third-party sources, first section is an instruction, second POVy. ♫Greatorangepumpkin♫T 11:08, 28 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete No news hits; seems to be a minor blog/board thing; no evidence of notability (ie, no reliable sources, and I can't find any) Chzz ► 14:33, 28 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Non notable fanon item which consists solely of violating copyrights to create a new "original" video game character by giving it a new color. The writing also seems to leech a little bit towards being an attack page towards those who do this. Nate • (chatter) 18:53, 28 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete As per above. It seems too much of a niche of a niche of a niche to be noteworthy. Golgofrinchian (talk) 19:23, 28 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, new term, original research, uncovered in reliable sources. Night Gyr (talk/Oy) 20:24, 28 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions. (G·N·B·S·RS·Talk) • Gene93k (talk) 15:45, 29 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:45, 29 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, no evidence of notability, and so poorly written that it would need to be completely rewritten even if it were a worthy article topic. Nyttend (talk) 22:35, 29 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.