Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Something Wicked Comes
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. I couldn't find an article on the band, but users are free to redirect it to there if they can find it. I will assist with a merge upon request. Mark Arsten (talk) 03:22, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Something Wicked Comes (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Not much available in terms of reliable sources for this album. There's some tidbits on the band but mostly on its individual members whose notability comes from being in other groups, not this one nor for the recording of the album. StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 21:43, 28 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 23:11, 28 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The article says that it is an album released by a group called "Billionaires Boys' Club". I had never heard of them, but if they are a notable hard rock group, would it not be better to have an article on them and merge this article with the article on them? I shall admit that I cannot say anything with authority here, because, as I have already admitted, I had never heard of the group. ACEOREVIVED (talk) 19:19, 2 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 20:30, 5 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete can't seem to find any reliable sources to establish notability, as per the WP:GNG. Vcessayist (talk) 01:50, 7 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Dori ☾Talk ☯ Contribs☽ 00:17, 13 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment I so much agree with ACEOREVIVED. I wonder if the author might not consider this a good idea? CamillePontalec (talk) 08:11, 13 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete As much as I would like to support up and coming bands, there really isn’t enough secondary material on this group to merit notability. I didn’t search long but after 8 google search pages, there wasn’t a single review of the band or its album available on a reliable site. The only positive for them is that they appeared in a video on NME Magazine’s website – 1 but this does not suggest notability… BarkingNigel (talk) 12:51, 18 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.