Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Snap Circuits

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:13, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Snap Circuits

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I am not sure if this article can ever demonstrate notability. I tried searching for sources and only came up with list sources that are trivial mentions of the article. The official website does make mentions of awards, but I cannot find any awards listed, nor can I find information that would suggest that the product is notable. Aasim - Herrscher of Wikis 04:32, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I do remember using this when I was younger and seeing it in schools, but I do not see any nontrivial coverage. This feels like a case of a topic that should be notable but there is nothing I could find that proves that this article is notable, which means that the topic is possibly not notable. Aasim - Herrscher of Wikis 04:33, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Toys-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 07:01, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep It's a thing, quite a clever thing. It has extensive coverage in educational discussions and books (try the wee Find sources links helpfully provided above). Best Alexandermcnabb (talk) 16:16, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. I've added some sources already, it really is notable. I also have something for the nominator![1].--Milowent • ^hasspoken 20:04, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Added another source. It's been pretty constantly reviewed and mentioned in "best toy" lists for a few years by major outlets. Skynxnex (talk) 20:41, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.