Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Smmcpan

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete , a SNOW delete. Also CSD G5, as created by a block-evading editor. JBW (talk) 23:21, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Smmcpan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No indication of notability, sources provided are company directory listings and the subject's own website. I am unable to find multiple reliable sources that significantly discuss the company. ... discospinster _talk 18:15, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. ... discospinster _talk 18:15, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. ... discospinster _talk 18:15, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. It's wildly too soon, the company has not been in business long enough to be written-about or have a track-record. The referencing is totally inadequate (e.g. to companies records, and currently the only record that exists is a $1, 1-share incorporation). And as for the comment about how their world-wide ranking, this is a company whose business is selling ranking-manipulation; you want a 10,000 likes on an Instagram post, they'll arrange it. As such, web-statistics about their world ranking are likely to be extraordinarily unreliable. Elemimele (talk) 18:46, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

*Keep the website of the compnany it has a good Ranking by Alexa — Preceding unsigned comment added by The TUrkish Producer (talk • contribs) 04:16, 29 December 2021 (UTC) [reply]

• Delete unless reliable sources are provided. @The TUrkish Producer: Alexa rankings are not a factor in determining notability. GoingBatty (talk) 04:32, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - would have been eligible for G5, as creator is a sock of user:علي أبو عمر. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:11, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as a sockpuppet-of-علي أبو عمر page creation. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:46, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Not enough RS and sockpuppet. Deathlibrarian (talk) 08:34, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy delete. Relatively straightforward WP:G5 and WP:G7 (only other major contributor has voted delete here) at this point. No need to keep this open unless we want to buff our AfD stats. Chess (talk) (please use {{reply to|Chess}} on reply) 22:22, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.