Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sleeve coupling

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge‎ to Coupling. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:56, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sleeve coupling

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Tagged for notability since 2010. Unsourced dictdef, so perhaps a candidate for Wiktionary. Fails WP:GNG. - UtherSRG (talk) 17:59, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Engineering-related deletion discussions. UtherSRG (talk) 17:59, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Merge the picture into coupling and redirect, the rest of the material is already duplicated there. - Indefensible (talk) 18:19, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to Coupling#Sleeve,_box,_or_muff where it is described. This topic might be notable; I have not checked. But as it it is, it is a near duplicate of the target section and it is best to merge the helpful diagram and redirect. --{{u|Mark viking}} {Talk} 17:08, 11 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.