Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Skyroof

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 02:26, 9 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Skyroof

Wikipedia is not a directory list of the millions of trademarks out there. This product has no evidence of notability. Also, note that the account User:SunroofGuy, which seems to have been created solely to protect the article Skyroof, has spammed users with nonsensical accusations of trademark infringement.[1][2]. —Lowellian (reply) 20:54, 4 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete- the nominator sums it up well. Wikipedia is not a directory of trademarks and commercial products. Reyk _YO! 23:30, 4 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Blatant use of Wikipedia for promotional purposes, even if not spam in the classic sense of the term. RayAYang (talk) 01:03, 5 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The sooner the better. ChildofMidnight (talk) 03:14, 5 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Agree, delete quickly. Luinfana (talk) 17:13, 5 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete After talking to the user about it after he contested the prod by email to me, I advised him to read over some of our core policies and guidelines and make the article meet the inclusion criteria a bit more. Since then, the article has become unbelievably spammy - beyond repair. Also, I don't feel the subject is notable enough to be given an article. Stwalkerster [ talk ] 19:55, 5 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: The opening of this AfD coincided with the closing of a Redirects for Discussion entry in which the relevance of redirecting Skyroof to Sunroof was being discussed. The RfD was closed on the grounds that the page had been redirected over the article we are discussing here. -- Blanchardb -^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}- timed 01:07, 7 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- By the way, Delete as spam. Let the guy earn his vexatious litigant tag. -- Blanchardb -^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}- timed 01:12, 7 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Merge with sunroof per above; no significant sources can be found per WP:V and WP:RS. Bearian (talk) 23:15, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.