Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Skiplagged

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Total keep. Withdrawn. Excellent work by AmericanAir88. (non-admin closure) scope_creep^Talk 23:19, 16 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Skiplagged

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:CORPDEPTH and WP:ORGIND. scope_creep^Talk 00:40, 16 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. feminist (talk) 02:18, 16 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. feminist (talk) 02:18, 16 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep A search on Google books shows books that explain the lawsuit and purpose of the website. A search onNews sites describe the method of the website and lawsuit. Google scholar shows plenty of reliable sources as well as does WP Refs. The article needs improvement, but it is notable for inclusion. Deletion is not cleanup AmericanAir88^(talk) 22:54, 16 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It wasn't Deletion is not cleanup. scope_creep^Talk 23:11, 16 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

That is a total miss. I will withdrawn it.scope_creep^Talk

@AmericanAir88: Thanks scope_creep^Talk 23:17, 16 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.