Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SketchFighter 4000 Alpha

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:18, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

SketchFighter 4000 Alpha

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Appears to be non-notable. All sources I'm seeing are either non-english (which since I only know English I can't tell if they show any reliability) or just say that it released and is Mac only. (note that this was copied from a PROD I did since i did not know the article had previously been PRODed) ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 13:02, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Video games, Technology, and Computing. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 13:02, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comment There is a small (1/3 page) review in Mac Life (July 2007, p. 73) and I found a longer review on Macworld.com [1] (and few short news about development). Notability may be borderline, but I think this game may pass GNG. I will look for other sources. Pavlor (talk) 08:05, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I also found that Mac Life review on Google Books too, along with a review from Macstories.net. Assuming Macworld and Macstories are reliable, it should be barely enough to pass WP:GNG. I'm voting a Weak Keep. PantheonRadiance (talk) 23:28, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Star Mississippi 02:09, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep There are some reliable sources covering the article subject, so it may - in my humble POV - pass GNG. Pavlor (talk) 06:11, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Also found this Engadget source, which has some opinions, like "this is a great little game with graphics so simple, it'll surprise you how much fun it is," making it a mini review of sorts. Therefore, it seems to scooch past notability barely. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 19:17, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.