Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sizzle Beach, U.S.A.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was nomination withdrawn. (non-admin closure) Donaldd23 (talk) 02:15, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sizzle Beach, U.S.A.

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article fails WP:NFSOURCES. Hitcher vs. Candyman (talk) 23:45, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 23:47, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep 6 citations listed here [[1]]. Plus, film debut of Kevin Costner, that's a seems to make it pass WP:NFO, "The film features significant involvement (i.e., one of the most important roles in the making of the film) by a notable person and is a major part of his/her career." Donaldd23 (talk) 00:44, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- 2 reviews ~~New York Times~~ New York Daily News and TV Guide have been added to the article. Donaldd23 (talk) 00:56, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: It's the New York Daily News, actually, but yes, there are now two reliable sources. — Toughpigs (talk) 01:11, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: This raises a fair question: do tabloid sources, like the New York Daily News, count as reliable sources? Hitcher vs. Candyman (talk) 01:22, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The Perennial sources list says "Most editors consider the content of New York Daily News articles to be generally reliable, but question the accuracy of its tabloid-style headlines." — Toughpigs (talk) 01:47, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Very well then, I withdraw this nomination. Hitcher vs. Candyman (talk) 01:54, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.