Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Siniša Majkus

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was KEEP. postdlf (talk) 15:39, 31 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Siniša Majkus

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete This pages is not notable. Wilbysuffolk Wilbysuffolk (talk) 11:24, 25 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Subject has won multiple national awards; I'd say that's notability. Keep. DS (talk) 13:02, 25 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:55, 26 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:55, 26 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Croatia-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:56, 26 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per DS. GregorB (talk) 09:25, 26 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, the Vladimir Nazor Award is a trivial proof of notability. Also, it would be useful if the AfD nomination was spelled correctly and not a one-liner. If the article clearly asserts notability by listing and referencing several awards, the onus is on the nominator to explain why they think that these assertions are invalid or insufficient. --Joy [shallot] (talk) 03:41, 27 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.