Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Singz Panachè

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 23:08, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Singz Panachè

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Semi-advertorialized WP:BLP of a musician, not reliably sourcing any strong claim to passing WP:NMUSIC. The strongest claim here is that he's "the official artist" of a record label -- but record labels simply do not ever designate one of the musicians or bands on their label as their "official artist" who somehow holds supremacy over other musicians or bands on their label, and the only source present to support the claim is the record label's own self-published website about itself (which, further, led to a 404 error when I tried to look at it.) Other than that, the only other sources here are his own self-published profiles on Beatport and Spotify and the website of an Android app, which are not reliable or notability-supporting sources, and there's not a single real media source being shown here at all. Nothing stated in this article is "inherently" notable enough to exempt him from having to have much, much better sourcing than this. Also conflict of interest, as the creator's username was "Singzmusic" — but as always, Wikipedia is not a free publicity platform on which musicians are entitled to place themselves just because they exist. Bearcat (talk) 16:27, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 16:27, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 16:27, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Super underground DJ who hasn't gotten any attention from reliable media. Of course the usual download sites, streaming service entries, youtube videos and lyrics sites all came up in a google search but they are not reliable sources and will never be. The article is clearly an attempted promotion, written by the subject himself. GhostDestroyer100 (talk) 18:32, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Vanity autobiography. Self promotional piece, notability not established. 2601:188:180:B8E0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 15:32, 12 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Definitely a self-written autobiography as an attempted promotion. The article breaks every Wikipedia rule on conflicts of interest and he has absolutely no evidence of notability to start with. ––DOOMSDAYER520 (TALK|CONTRIBS) 22:02, 12 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.