Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sin-air-ey

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 11:09, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sin-air-ey (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Non-notable group. Very few results in multiple search engines. Squirepants101 21:29, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. I find nothing at all that is notable about this "group." Seems like complete bollocks. --Evb-wiki 21:52, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Also, this "article" was created by a vandal, who was blocked both as User:R.tails and as a sock puppet. User:R.tails removed the speedy-delete tag I originally placed numerous times. --Evb-wiki 14:38, 7 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete This article reads incoherently and doesn't appear to have a point, as well as being unsourced and unreferenced. Possible candidate for {{db-context}}. (aeropagitica) 22:57, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Unsourced article with no relevant Google hits, about a fictional organization but written from an in-universe perspective with no context explaining where one would find references to this organization in the real world. --Metropolitan90 23:47, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Strong Delete Completely fails the Google test. Not clear what kind of group this is is supposed to be, but we speedily delete more coherent articles about somewhat less non-notable gaming groupings all the time. --Finngall ^talk 02:48, 6 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete difficult to understand what this supposed to be about, but I gather it may be a potential "cartoon" judging by the reference added to the WP article on the Cartoon Network, [[1]], but the ref has been deleted as unfactual. Seems like something made up in school one day, judging by its lack of any sources whatsoever Slp1 21:08, 6 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.