Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Silver Street, London

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Daniel (talk) 03:55, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Silver Street, London (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Deprodded without rationale or improvement. While this street existed, not enough in-depth coverage to pass WP:GNG. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:08, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 15:35, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep The nomination's claims are false. Following the prod, the article was being improved by Thoughtfortheday but they seem too shy to have removed the impertinent tag. As for the topic, the place is quite historic and there are multiple books specifically about it including The Lodger: His Life on Silver Street and The History of the Church in Silver Street, London. And, as it has a history which goes back centuries until the Germans bombed it, it is naturally covered in general histories of London including London, Past and Present; The History and Antiquities of London; A Book about London: The Streets of London; &c. Andrew🐉(talk) 16:11, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep There is certainly quite a range of material related to Silver Street and this is being added into the article — GhostInTheMachine ^{talk to me} 20:35, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 02:59, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 02:59, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep I would have voted delete based on the current article, just because Shakespeare lived in a house on the street that doesn't make it notable. However, Andrew Davidson's sources check out - there is enough coverage to keep this (particularly in The Lodger: His Life on Silver Street). power~enwiki (π, ν) 23:44, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per all above. -- Necrothesp (talk) 14:27, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.