Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Silicon Milkroundabout

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Wifione ^Message 10:27, 17 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Silicon Milkroundabout (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet criteria under WP:EVENT. FunkyCanute (talk) 11:45, 10 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 14:20, 10 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 14:20, 10 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 14:20, 10 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep Meets WP:GNG, numerous reliable sources establish notability. —Tom Morris (talk) 14:23, 10 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep obviously, as original editor of the article, I believe it meets WP:GNG :-) I think there's enough sources, and I'm happy to add a few more that have occurred since the latest Milkroundabout. These I think meet WP:EVENT. Claviere (talk) 15:02, 10 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - the topic passes WP:GNG, per [1], [2], [3], and [4]. Northamerica1000^(talk) 20:06, 10 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep It gets coverage. Dream Focus 19:08, 14 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.