Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Silicon India

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete minimal discussion, but no dissent.--Anthony Bradbury"talk" 09:43, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Silicon India

Silicon India (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article created by a blocked sock. PRODded with reason " Spammy article, no in-depth independent reliable sources, does not meet WP:GNG.". Expired PROD removed by Kvng with reason "potentially controversial deletion, see talk" (referring to a comment on the talk page by mentioned sock). PROD reason still stands, hence: Delete. Randykitty (talk) 16:12, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. GabeIglesia (talk) 17:25, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. No evidence of notability. (Also, rather promotional in tone.) The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 23:33, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:47, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:47, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:47, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as nothing currently suggesting the necessary notability improvements. SwisterTwister talk 22:07, 25 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.