Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sierra Snow
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 00:18, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Sierra Snow (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
No reliable sources, and doesn't pass the criteria at WP:PORNBIO. Epbr123 (talk) 19:56, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Certainly seems below notability standards. There are no extensive sources which discuss (rather than merely name) the subject... --Jayron32.talk.contribs 20:09, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:02, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:19, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and actresses-related deletion discussions. —• Gene93k (talk) 02:28, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Does not meet neithe WP:PORNBIO nor WP:BIO because "database sources are not considered credible since they are, like wikis, mass-edited with little oversight." Tosqueira (talk) 03:57, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Fails WP:PORNBIO. Tatarian (talk) 09:33, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Inadequately sourced BLP, also fails the GNG. RMHED (talk) 20:29, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.