Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sic Squared Records

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Michaelzeng7 (talk) 23:52, 21 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sic Squared Records

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject of the article does not appear to meet WP:GNG. The only reference within the article is to a now-dead link, and a search for reliable third party sources about this company produces only "books" that are themselves composed of Wikipedia articles (i.e., that draw from this article in a circle). Other sources do not appear to be available, so I propose that the article be Deleted from the Wikipedia main namespace. KDS4444^Talk 17:32, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Dan arndt (talk) 04:08, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Dan arndt (talk) 04:08, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Fixing the broken link was trivial; you could have done that, instead you went to AFD. While I don't question your good faith, I do question the quality of your deletion nominations. This is another bad one - David Gerard (talk) 12:25, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep have added numerous references, which establish its notability. Dan arndt (talk) 14:08, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:22, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: Passes WP:CORP. SL93 (talk) 22:19, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per David Gerard, Dan arndt and SL93. Notability has been established.shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 13:16, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.