Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Siasun Robotics

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) b uidhe 00:09, 25 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Siasun Robotics

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and has been written in an advertising manner. The article does not cite secondary reliable sources. Abishe (talk) 14:02, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Abishe (talk) 14:02, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. Abishe (talk) 14:02, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keepish or Draftify. I agree that the article is somewhat promotional, it definitely needs a clean-up, but I have found secondary sources that can be used to expand the article: LePoint, Profile on Bloomberg, China Daily, Bangkok Post, Business Wire. So my option is to keep and enhance. Less Unless (talk) 15:06, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I spent some time adding the valuable secondary sources from Less Unless to the article, as well as doing some general cleanup to it. I believe that the company itself has enough notability to be included. While looking for other secondary sources, many news corporations discussed the company, with the company's own findings coming up in journals from at least 2002. Some cleanup could still be done though to bring it to a more acceptable level, but as it stands now, it's at least much less promotional than before. Khu'hamgaba Kitap^talk 01:53, 19 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.