Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shuvam Banerjee

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Daniel (talk) 07:51, 9 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Shuvam Banerjee

Shuvam Banerjee (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet criteria of WP:NPOL or WP:NACADEMIC. ... discospinster _talk 22:55, 19 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. ... discospinster _talk 22:55, 19 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. ... discospinster _talk 22:55, 19 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: Since the subject fails NPOL, he must satisfy the general GNG criteria for which we need significant coverage from multiple reliable sources. As far I can see, there are no sources like that. Kichu🐘 ^{Need any help?} 00:07, 20 April 2021 (UTC) Blocked sockpuppet --Goldsztajn (talk) 12:13, 6 May 2021 (UTC) [reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 09:17, 20 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 09:17, 20 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. As usual, student unions are not WP:NPOL-passing political offices that guarantee inclusion in Wikipedia — but this article is extremely overdependent on primary sources that are not support for notability at all, such as the organization's own self-published content about itself. raw tables of election results and pieces of his own bylined academic writing, with no evidence of any reliable source coverage about him for the purposes of getting him over WP:GNG in lieu of having to hold a notable political office. Bearcat (talk) 15:32, 20 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. President of AISF is something that could plausibly be notable through WP:GNG, but for that we need multiple in-depth independent reliable sources and we don't appear to have any. —David Eppstein (talk) 04:53, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as others have said. Lacks significent independant coverage. -Kj cheetham (talk) 16:16, 22 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: No reliable sources, no evidence of notability. Fails GNG. TheDreamBoat (talk) 10:57, 23 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

New Source has been added.

1. https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/elections/assembly-elections/west-bengal/turned-down-novartis-worked-on-covid-joined-bengals-poll-fight/articleshow/82235041.cms?from=mdr

2. https://thewire.in/politics/cpim-candidates-west-bengal-elections-aishe-ghosh Skylark007 (talk) 05:29, 25 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep: President of All India Students' Federation can be considered as notable because of organizational pan india presence. News coverage for confirming the notability are enough, all of them has been reported by national media platforms. This thing should not be ignored. Besides there are several student organization leaders with the same stature having stable wikipedia pages and are being considered notable, considering the page for deletion is questionable and exclusive tdhole997 (talk) 01:00, 26 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.