Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shpilberg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. Salvio ^{Let's talk about it!} 13:49, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Shpilberg

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails notability requirements. I can't find any secondary sources about this band. I would have prodded but the creator removed a prod tag in the past. Slp1 (talk) 20:52, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 14:25, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Arguably an A7 speedy, but I'll just go with a regular delete as this band has not received coverage in reliable sources. -- Whpq (talk) 16:45, 25 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Has no indication of why the band's famous. No notable chart singles either. Minima © (talk) 16:49, 25 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Can't find any reliable source coverage here. Qrsdogg (talk) 01:07, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy - I've applied the A7 tag to it, per my general feelings at WP:YAMB. → ROUX ₪ 10:50, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.