Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Show of Hands (application)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jenks24 (talk) 14:36, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Show of Hands (application)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG with no secondary sources, just its own website, Tumblr and YouTube video. McGeddon (talk) 10:16, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Dialectric (talk) 01:31, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete for now - Nothing better. SwisterTwister talk 20:58, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - there is significant coverage on this in a number of app review sites including apppicker.com, appleappinsight.com, and appszoom.com. Whether these sources meet the standard of WP:RS is an open question.Dialectric (talk) 00:37, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 01:43, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:31, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete All the sources in the article are first-party. I checked out the sources suggested by Dialectric. IHMO, app reviews on websites with unknown editorial review don't establish notability. One of the reviews gives the app 5 stars, then says, The only thing I really did not like about this application is that it constantly crashes. I gotta wonder how many stars it would have gotten if it didn't crash constantly. -- RoySmith (talk) 02:17, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.