Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shoppers Stop (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) J 947^{^{^{(c) (m)}}} 18:33, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Shoppers Stop

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

nn business. Nothing changed since the prev Afd: Sources are routine PR coverage Staszek Lem (talk) 00:14, 29 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep – Google Books results are providing multiple instances of significant coverage in reliable sources for this WP:LISTED company. The article does not have a particularly promotional tone at this time. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:55, 29 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Keep - Consensus can change, but I think the previous AfD discussion is still valid. WP:NEXIST applies here, and as North America points out, the article (while short) seems to be in at least a non-WP:TNT state. Cthomas3 (talk) 01:10, 29 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 04:24, 29 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 04:24, 29 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 04:24, 29 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep notable retail chain; supported by sources.E.M.Gregory (talk) 12:12, 29 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep This is a very famous chain of apparel stores in India. I know it may be hard to understand for others, but Shoppers Stop is a well known brand, just like Pantaloons Fashion & Retail. It was one of the first "mega stores" when the malls started proliferating across India.--DreamLinker (talk) 19:49, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.