Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shmuel Hoffman
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 03:54, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Shmuel Hoffman (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Delete Does not meet WP:CREATIVE or WP:ENT. Lacks significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject. Previously deleted for A7, then recreated by the wife of the subject. The only sources that mention the subject include a blog and YouTube. Cind.amuse 17:50, 17 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, not notable. (I think I may have been the one who originally speedied this before it was re-created - it certainly looks familiar, which suggests that the re-creator hasn't bothered to add anything.) Roscelese (talk ⋅ contribs) 22:38, 17 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:21, 18 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:22, 18 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Dusti*poke* 20:31, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment For those who cannot view deleted revisions: This page has been created 3 times by User:Margelit. The first was on 5 January, it was speedily deleted 10 hours later. The page was recreated on 9 January, again speedily deleted. It was then recreated in its current form on 16 January, nominated for speedy then declined and is now here at AFD. The content is approximately identical in each iteration, with some differences in external linking and detail. Hope that's helpful! l'aquatique[talk] 22:10, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.