Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shivam Bangwal

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Being WP:BOLD and closing this per WP:SNOW. Missvain (talk) 21:29, 4 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Shivam Bangwal

Shivam Bangwal (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable social media digital marketer who lacks in-depth significant coverage in reliable sources independent of them. Celestina007 (talk) 21:27, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 21:27, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 21:27, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 21:27, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete No SIGCOV, fails the GNG. Regards, --Goldsztajn (talk) 21:35, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Promo content only. Dr.KBAHT (talk) 22:16, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Those “sources” are hilarious. Mccapra (talk) 04:17, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as mentioned by others No SIGCOV, fails the GNG. defcon5 (talk) 09:16, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Deffinitelly not notable, at least not in English. (I have no idea how a 21 year old digital marketer can be notable.) Page creator, User:Wanderer kanishk, also contributed to a number of other articles which seem promotional. Anton.bersh (talk) 11:06, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Oh, could have been speedy too! Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 18:07, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Has been speedied previously. --DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:00, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as blatantly and utterly non-notable vanity piece. Probably needs salting, too, as it keeps cropping up. --DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:00, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: No reliable sources, no evidence of notability. TheDreamBoat (talk) 02:15, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.