Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shine Screens (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:21, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Shine Screens (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Soft delete after AfD in October 2023. Undeletion requested by now blocked sock who moved to the main space. Looking closer, this needs to meet WP:NCORP and falls short based on the references not meeting WP:ORGCRIT. CNMall41 (talk) 17:16, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and India. CNMall41 (talk) 17:17, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film and Telangana. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:53, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. The sources make the page short of notability because I did not find any that address the subject of the article in depth. It is just routine announcements on what film was produced under the subject banner and that is not sufficient for a notable attention. RangersRus (talk) 14:09, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete This is a company therefore GNG/WP:NCORP criteria apply, none of the references meet the criteria. HighKing⁺⁺ 11:40, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.