Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shimla Mirchi

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was moved back to Draft:Shimla Mirchi. There is consensus that this article should not exist as it is, but no particularly strong consensus that it must be deleted right away. Moving it to draft will provide an opportunity for improvements to be made if new developments allow it. If not, it will automatically be deleted as abandoned after six months without improvement. If someone wants to redirect the title elsewhere in the interim, please feel free. bd2412 T 22:17, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Shimla Mirchi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Promotional article about an unreleased movie - according to the sources it has finished principal photography but is unlikely to ever be released. None of the sources has any in-depth coverage, all of them are brief notices and at least a couple are clearly rewritten press releases. bonadea contributions talk 13:24, 26 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. bonadea contributions talk 14:44, 26 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. bonadea contributions talk 14:44, 26 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Reluctant delete - the fact it hasn't been released does not bode well. As a result there's no means of establishing if it will really have any notability. It has notable actors attached to it, so there's that, but by all accounts that I've seen it's really vaporware. Reluctant delete without any prejudice of recreating if it's ever released. Canterbury Tail talk 20:28, 26 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect BOVINEBOY2008 13:21, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.