Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sher-e-Lahore (2001 film)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. with a leave for speedy renomination. (non-admin closure) Armbrust, B.Ed. ^{Let's talk}_{about my edits?} 10:41, 29 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sher-e-Lahore (2001 film)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Zero refs. Zero gnews hits. I can't find sufficient substantial RS coverage to indicate notability. Others are welcome to try. Epeefleche (talk) 22:41, 7 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:28, 8 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:28, 8 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Understandable difficulties in finding modern-day coverage for this 10-year-old Pakistani film... many due to the article's chosen name. Film is searchable as Shere Lahore, and Variety international film guide calls it "the number four hit". Could Pakistani Wikipedians please assist with finding coverage for this "number four hit"? Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 18:24, 8 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Armbrust, B.Ed. ^{Let's talk}_{about my edits?} 15:43, 14 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Armbrust, B.Ed. ^{Let's talk}_{about my edits?} 13:05, 21 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.