Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shekhey pind (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep as the subject passes WP:GEOLAND (non-admin closure) FITINDIA 00:27, 16 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Shekhey pind

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This should be deleted due to a lack of notability. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Duck1738 (talk • contribs) 22:05, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. ^{Babymissfortune} 00:31, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. ^{Babymissfortune} 00:31, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep and move to Shekhe Pind per the consensus of the previous AfD debate. Legally recognized settlements are notable per WP:GEOLAND regardless of size. According to Census of India, the 2011 population was 487.[1] • Gene93k (talk) 02:07, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - passes WP:GEOLAND. I agree with Gene93k that if it is kept the article should be moved to the correct spelling (which should have been done after the last AfD). Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:55, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep passes WP:GEOLAND.There is mention of the place in the some mention PUDA cancels flat scheme The Tribune ,Here its postal code is 144025.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 20:27, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.