Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sheetal Cool Products Limited

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 02:37, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sheetal Cool Products Limited

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails at WP:ORGIND and WP:SIGCOV. May be WP:LISTED but that's not enough to prove entity's encyclopedic value or notability. If not delete, then a draftifcation option is always open. Hence, calling for an AfD discussion. - Hatchens (talk) 02:38, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Hatchens (talk) 02:38, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Hatchens (talk) 02:38, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: No significant coverage in independent reliable sources to demonstrate notability. ––FormalDude ^talk 02:46, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: Before publishing the article I noticed that there are many pages (companies) which don't even have 4 or 5 links. But I have added many links.--PQR01 (talk) 03:03, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@PQR01: Kindly link those articles, I'll be happy to nominate them for deletion as well. ––FormalDude ^talk 04:09, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@FormalDude: These are some pages with less references - AYM Syntex Limited, Atul Auto, Aptech, Amalgamations Group, Amalgamations Group.-PQR01 (talk) 04:28, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete based on updated information and I am unable to locate any old analyst reports either. ~~Comment~~ There are not sufficient existing articles to meet NCORP criteria for establishing notability but since this company is listed, there may be analyst reports which meet the criteria. I am unable to locate any but perhaps someone else can? I'm leaning towards Delete but happy to review if better references turn up. HighKing⁺⁺ 17:03, 12 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 20:55, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete It was listed four years ago on BSE SME (not SENSEX as claimed in the article) and now not cooperating with credit raters. None of the big brokerages cover it and I suspect nobody else does too. hemantha (brief) 07:23, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.