Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shawn C. Phillips (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 17:38, 13 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Shawn C. Phillips

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence of any notability. One ref is an interview and another is one of his own YouTube videos. The Big Issue reports no content related to the subject even in a search and IMDB is an unreliable source. Searches reveal very little except the expected swathe of social media references. Fails WP:GNG Velella ^{Velella Talk} 14:23, 6 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I checked real name and his youtube alias and wasn't able to find reliable source coverage to validate that he meets WP:GNG. Has a lot of credits on IMDB, but having a bunch of mostly minor roles in non-notable films doesn't add up to meeting WP:NACTOR. Now, if it could be validated that he has a large cult following, he could get a pass on criteria 2 of that notability guideline, but none of the references I can find seem to demonstrate that. PohranicniStraze (talk) 16:37, 6 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:43, 6 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:43, 6 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Maryland-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:43, 6 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Unable to find anything demonstrating notability. Mcewan (talk) 17:48, 6 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Doesn't pass WP:NActor .Nothing i found about this subject shows that they pass the notability guidelines of this site. JC7V-constructive zone 05:00, 7 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Clearly fails the WP:GNG and WP:NACTOR. -- LACaliNYC ✉ 21:02, 9 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete There's no evidence of the significant independent coverage in reliable sources needed to meet WP:GNG nor is there anything to show WP:NACTOR is met. Papaursa (talk) 23:04, 10 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.