Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shaun Dooley
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was nomination withdrawn. Withdrawn by nominator. (non-admin closure) JMHamo (talk) 22:06, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
- Shaun Dooley (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:NACTOR and WP:GNG, unable to find significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent JMHamo (talk) 23:39, 11 December 2015 (UTC)
- NOMINATION WITHDRAWN JMHamo (talk) 22:05, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
- Keep. Lots of coverage on Google News. For example, [1], which says he won Best Supporting Actor at the BBC Audio Drama Awards. Also, interviews and such: [2] at The Stage, [3] at Digital Spy, and [4] from Radio Times. Lots more hits from Radio Times, too. I didn't click on them, though. I'm happy with what I found and don't think I need to copy-paste ten URLs into this AfD. Someone should rewrite this page, but it's probably not going to be me. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 07:03, 12 December 2015 (UTC)
- Keep - WP:GNG - Significant coverage in reliable independent sources. I did a search on Highbeam, which gave over 200 newsitems. Items specifically about him in the Huffington Post (which I added to the article), The Telegraph and The Guardian. Article has sufficient sources to show relevance. Sincerely, Taketa (talk) 17:07, 16 December 2015 (UTC)
- Keep as meets GNG - The article's been in a crap state since Misfits was on (which was in 2013!) and so it needs to be redone but either way judging by the results on Google I'd say notability's there[5]/ –Davey2010Talk 00:46, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.