Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shaul Aaron

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was IAR delete. As the person who just closed the Oron Shaul AfD, I'm going to boldly delete this article per speedy criterion G8, in accordance with the outcome there, even though this AfD has not run the standard seven days. If anyone wants to contest the closure, please leave a message on my talk page. Deor (talk) 08:36, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Shaul Aaron

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Was deleted under WP:A7, which was appealed to deletion review. The outcome of that review was to list on AfD. My role in this relisting is purely administrative; I offer no opinion on the outcome. -- RoySmith (talk) 00:05, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. I am the horrible administrator who deleted it. Regardless of that, please see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oron Shaul.--Bbb23 (talk) 00:09, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy close and redirect to Oron Shaul. While I agree that the consensus of the deletion review was to restore and take it to AFD, that was only because most of the participants in the discussion apparently didn't read my comment that another version of the article already was at AFD. Since a discussion on the merits of an article on this individual has already been going on at that other AFD, there is no point to having this discussion as well. Calathan (talk) 00:29, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Administrative note: I missed that when I closed the DRV. To be honest, the outcome seemed so obvious, I only skimmed the text. I don't know enough about Hebrew names to tell if these really are the same person. Clearly, if they are indeed the same person, this AfD is moot. -- RoySmith (talk) 00:46, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - The article is a biography of a living person, who is claimed to have been abducted by an organization, appears to be notable for only one event and therefore does not warrant a Wikipedia article. And, seriously Wikipedia is not CNN, but an encyclopedia. Anupmehra -Let's talk! 01:20, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Agree with Calathan, as creator of this article maybe this can be done speedily. PatGallacher (talk) 01:53, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.