Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shark2six

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 17:18, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Shark2six

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The subject of this article fails WP:GNG and WP:MUSICBIO. A Google search of him only brings up promotional links. Versace1608 ^{Wanna Talk?} 01:21, 5 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Versace1608 ^{Wanna Talk?} 01:21, 5 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Versace1608 ^{Wanna Talk?} 01:21, 5 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions. Versace1608 ^{Wanna Talk?} 01:21, 5 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: non notable promotional content that fails NMUSICBIO. Surprising how some of these articles manage to stay on Wikipedia for so long. I can understand if there's atom of notability, but this is purely nn. Glad to have you back Versace! HandsomeBoy (talk) 21:15, 9 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Fails notability, no single decent RS that would support it. Britishfinance (talk) 18:02, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.