Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ShareTheMusic

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 06:23, 17 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ShareTheMusic

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable website. Somewhat promotional/"about us" tone, was clearly created by a COI editor (named "stm team"), no significant coverage in external sources (references are Alexa rankings, a blog-like "startup review" which doesn't actually say much about the company, and a bunch of press releases). Fails WP:NWEBSITE because of the lack of sgnificant independent coverage. The mechanism that is used here might actually be notable if it had external coverage (particularly of the legality), but no such coverage appears to exist. creffett (talk) 00:20, 10 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. creffett (talk) 00:20, 10 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. creffett (talk) 00:20, 10 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Aside from Alexa and 2 press releases, there are hardly any sources cited, none of which are RS. Also, there is even a section titled "Legality" which just seems like it is arguing on enwiki that it is legal; hardly encyclopedic. Given that it is currently #4.2 million on Alexa, and has very little to no coverage by RS is pretty convincing that it is not WP:NOTABLE. Mgasparin (talk) 08:21, 10 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:N; there are almost no reliable sources, and, aside from social media and their website, there are no relevant sources online. Luke ^Talk 00:52, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.